“A podcast would be fun!”: The fetishization of digital writing projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.915Keywords:
digital writing, multimodality, Plurilingualism, writing centres, fetishization, digital nativesAbstract
While digital writing projects (DWPs) like podcasts, videos, and infographics are rigorous sites of scholarly knowledge production, the growth in their popularity as classroom assignments often has more to do with a sense that these are “fun” assignments. Horner, Selfe, and Lockridge (2015) describe such dismissive attitudes using the term fetishization. When DWPs are fetishized by students and faculty, they are celebrated while being dismissed as pedestrian fads. Ultimately, fetishization decreases the amount of support offered by faculty, the effort invested by students, as well as the demand (and budget) for learning service support. This means that disparities between students (including access to technologies, digital literacies, and “normative” abilities) are exaggerated. In this paper, we illuminate four interconnected drivers of fetishization that obscure the realities of DWPs—the myth of digital natives, assumptions about tool-content division, faith in digital tool neutrality, and idealizations of the web. Like all teaching approaches, thoughtful instructional design and learning supports are required for DWPs to create effective, equitable, safe, inclusive, and accessible learning opportunities. This paper enhances writing instructors’ and tutors’ ability to challenge fetishized perspectives of DWPs in their work with faculty and students alike.
References
Akçayir, M., Dündar, H., & Akçayir, G. (2016). What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980? Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.089
Arola, K. L., Ball, C. E., & Sheppard, J. (2014). Writer/designer: A guide to making multimodal projects. Macmillan Higher Education.
Baglieri, S. (2020). Toward inclusive education? Focusing a critical lens on universal design for learning. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 9(5), 42–74. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v9i5.690
Beck, E. (2018). Implications of persuasive computer algorithms. In J. Alexander, & J. Rhodes (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital writing and rhetoric (1st Ed.) (pp. 291–302). Routledge.
Bell, S. (2017). High impact creative pedagogy using a maker model of composition. Journal of Faculty Development, 31(1), 1–6.
Bell, S. (2019). Learner-created podcasts: Fostering information literacies in a writing course. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 29, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.747
Bell, S., & Hotson, B. (2020). Tooling up the multi: Paying attention to digital writing projects at the writing centre. Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 30. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.785
Bell, S., & Hotson, B. (2021). Where is the support? Learning support for multimodal digital writing assignments by writing centres in Canadian higher education. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(1).
Belliotti, A. R. (2016). Power: Oppression, subservience, and resistance. State University of New York Press.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Bezemer, J. (2012, March 15). What is a mode? Berit Hendriksen and Gunther Kress discuss the notions of ‘mode’, ‘resource’, ‘affordance’ and ‘sign’. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ2gz_OQHhI
Bowman, S. (2020). Educating the digital native: Teaching students in a binge-watching world. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-with-technology-articles/educating-the-digital-native-teaching-students-in-a-binge-watching-world/
Brown, P. (1994). Hype, hope and cyberspace -or- paradigms lost: Pedagogical problems at the digital frontier. eCAADe, 7–13.
Brooke, C., & Rickert, T. (2011). Being delicious: Materialities of research in a Web 2.0 application. In S. Vastola, M. Rice, & J. A. Dobrin (Eds.), Beyond Postprocess (pp. 163–183). Utah State University Press.
Canada’s Digital Charter in Action: A Plan by Canadians, for Canadians. (2019). Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (pdf). Retrieved from https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/062.nsf/eng/h_00109.html
Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). Negotiating the local in English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 197-218. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190506000109
Ceraso, S. (2014). (Re)educating the senses: Multimodal listening, bodily learning, and the composition of sonic experiences. College English, 77(2), 102–123.
Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment companion volume with new descriptors. (2018). Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989
Council of Europe. (2004). From linguistic diversity to plurilingual education: Guide for the development of language education policies in Europe. Strasbourg. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1c4
Donahue, C. (2009). “Internationalization” and composition studies: Reorienting the discourse. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), 212-243.
Drubin, D. G., & Kellogg, D. R. (2012). English as the universal language of science: Opportunities and challenges. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 23(8). https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E12-02-0108
Ehret, C., & Hollett, T. (2014). Embodied composition in real virtualities: Adolescents’ literacy practices and felt experiences moving with digital, mobile devices in school. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(4), 428–452.
Emig, J. (1988). Writing as a mode of learning. In V. Villaneuva (Ed.), Cross-talk in comp theory: A reader (pp. 7–15). National Council of Teachers of English.
FIPPA for Faculty 2: FIPPA and Student Information. (2022). York University. Retrieved from https://ipo.info.yorku.ca/tool-and-tips/fippa-and-student-information-best-practices-for-instructors/
FIPPA – Privacy of Student Info. (2022). North Island College. Retrieved from https://teachanywhere.opened.ca/teaching-digitally/fippa-privacy-of-student-info/
FIPPA - Some Basics for Faculty and Staff. (2022). University of Western Ontario. Retrieved from https://www.uwo.ca/vpfinance/legalcounsel/privacy/fippa.html
The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act: R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER F.31 Consolidation. (2022). Government of Manitoba. Retrieved from https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90f31
Gonzales, L. (2015). Multimodality, translingualism, and rhetorical genre studies. Composition Forum, 31(31).
Gonzales, A. L., Calarco, J. M., & Lynch, T. K. (2018). Technology problems and student achievement gaps: A validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct. Communication Research, (August), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218796366
Goodley, D., Cameron, D., Liddiard, K., Parry, B., Runswick-Cole, K., Whitburn, B., & Wong, M. E. (2020). Rebooting inclusive education? New technologies and disabled people. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 9(5), 515–549. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v9i5.707
Grammarly Privacy Policy. (2019). Grammarly. Retrieved from https://www.grammarly.com/privacy-policy
Grutsch McKinney, J. (2009). New media matters: Tutoring in the late age of print. Writing Center Journal, 29(2), 28-51.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.) (pp. 3–35). Harper & Row.
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227
Horner, B., Lu, M., Royster, J. J., & Trimbur, J. (2011). Language difference in writing: Toward a translingual approach. College English, 73(3), 303–321. Retrieved from https://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty/67/
Horner, B., Selfe, C., & Lockridge, T. (2015). Translinguality, transmodality, and difference: Exploring dispositions and change in language and learning. In Faculty Scholarship (Vol. 76). Retrieved from http://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty%5Cnhttp://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty/76%5Cnhttps://works.bepress.com/bruce-horner/20/
History of the Web. (2022). World Wide Web Foundation. Retrieved from https://webfoundation.org/about/vision/history-of-the-web/
Hotson, B., & Bell, S. (2020). Three foundational concepts for tutoring digital writing. WLN: A Journal of Writing Center Scholarship, 44(1–2), 18–25.
Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28(2), 200–207.
Joy, O. (2012). What does it mean to be a digital native? CNN Business. Retrieved from: https://www.cnn.com/2012/12/04/business/digital-native-prensky/index.html
Jubin, J., & Tornow, J. D. (1987). The DARPA Packet Radio Network Protocols. Proceedings of the IEEE, 75(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1987.13702
Judd, T. (2018). The rise and fall (?) of the digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 99–119. https://doi.org/AE 2013029
Kling, R. (1991). Cooperation, coordination and control in computer-supported work. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/125319.125396
Kyburz, B. L. (2019). Cruel auteurism: Affective digital mediation towards film-composition. University Press of Colorado.
Link, M. (2002). Transforming support: From helpdesk to information center. Proceedings ACM SIGUCCS User Services Conference, 272–274.
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s Internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media and Society, 20(3), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930
Lunden, I. (2019). Grammarly raises $90M at over $1B+ valuation for its AI-based grammar and writing tools. TechCrunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/10/grammarly-raises-90m-at-over-1b-valuation-for-its-ai-based-grammar-and-writing-tools/
Mannheimer, S. (2016). Some semi-deep thoughts about deep reading: Rejoinder to “digital technology and student cognitive development: The neuroscience of the university classroom.” Journal of Management Education, 40(4), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916630771
Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ academic reading format preferences and behaviors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009
Moeggenberg, Z. C. (2018). Keeping safe (and queer). In J. Alexander & J. Rhodes (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital writing and rhetoric (pp. 225–236). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315518497
Molot, C. (18 November 2021). Grammarly is now the 10th most valuable U.S. startup. Blomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-18/grammar-checking-app-is-now-the-10th-most-valuable-u-s-startup
National Cyber Security Strategy. (2018). Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (pdf). Retrieved from https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ntnl-cbr-scrt-strtg/index-en.aspx
Novet, J. (17 Nov 2021). Text-checking software maker Grammarly is worth $13 billion in latest funding round. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/18/text-checking-software-maker-grammarly-is-worth-13-billion.html
Passanisi, J., & Peters, S. (2012). Being a digital native isn’t enough. Retrieved from Scientific American website: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/being-a-digital-native-isnt-enough/
Pigg, S. (2014). Emplacing mobile composing habits: A study of academic writing in networked social spaces. College Composition and Communication, 66(2), 250–275.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon: The Strategic Planning Resource for Education Professionals, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Prior, P., & Shipka, J. (2003). Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In C. Bazerman, & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves / writing societies: Research from activity perspective (pp. 180–238). Fort Collin, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.
Rickerts, T. (2013). Ambient rhetoric: The attunements of rhetorical being. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Roderick, I. (2016). Critical discourse studies and technology: A multimodal approach to analyzing technoculture. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474258487.0005
Sennett, R. (2007). The culture of the new capitalism. Yale University Press.
Sheppard, J. (2009). The rhetorical work of multimedia production practices: It’s more than just technical skill. Computers and Composition, 26(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.02.004
Shin, D. S., & Cimasko, T. (2008). Multimodal composition in a college ESL class: New tools, traditional norms. Computers and Composition, 25(4), 376-395.
Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin Books.
Singer, N., & Merrill, J. B. (28 June 2015). When a company is put up for sale, in many cases, your personal data is, too. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/by/natasha-singer
Silver, N. (2019). My writing writing: Student conceptions of writing and self-perceptions of multimodal compositional development. In A. R. Gere (Ed.), Developing writers in higher education: A longitudinal study (pp. 217–246). University of Michigan Press.
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
Tusikov, N., & Haggart, B. (2018). Policy Brief No. 142 — October 2018: Implementing a national data strategy: The need for innovative public consultations. Retrieved from https://www.cigionline.org/documents/1522/Policy Brief No.142web.pdf
Taylor, G. (2020). Why lever style shifted production to digital natives [Video]. Sourcing Journal. Retrieved from: https://sourcingjournal.com/topics/sourcing/lever-style-apparel-manufacturer-digitally-native-brands-stanley-szeto-214894/
Wargo, J. M. (2018). Writing with wearables? Young children’s intra-active authoring and the sounds of emplaced invention. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(4), 502–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X18802880
Warner, J. (2020). Another terrible idea from Turnitin. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/another-terrible-idea-turnitin
Wong, J. C. (23 August 2019). Document reveals how Facebook downplayed early Cambridge Analytica concerns. The Guardian. Retreived from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/aug/23/cambridge-analytica-facebook-response-internal-document
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.
Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. New Labor Forum, 28(1). 10–29. doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Brian Hotson, Stephanie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
If this article is selected for publication in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, the work shall be published electronically under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows users to adapt and build upon the published work, but requires them to attribute the original publication and license their derivative works under the same terms. There is no fee required for submission or publication. Authors retain unrestricted copyright and all publishing rights, and are permitted to deposit all versions of their paper in an institutional or subject repository.
