Research Article Introductions as Hero Narratives
A Reading Strategy for Undergraduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.917Keywords:
Research articles, Reading, Genre-based instructionAbstract
This article describes a strategy for teaching undergraduate students to read research articles (RAs)—called the hero narrative reading strategy. This strategy modifies an existing approach to reading RAs (the Scientific Argumentation Model [SAM]), which teaches students to identify an article’s rhetorical moves. The hero narrative reading strategy relabels the rhetorical moves that the SAM identifies in RA introductions (Motive and Objective), and it frames RA introductions as hero narratives; students are taught to see RA writers as making hero claims—claims that they are stepping up to address a critical problem that previous research has not adequately addressed. This strategy can help students to understand the rhetorical structure of RAs.
References
Gillen, C. M. (2006). Criticism and interpretations: Teaching the persuasive aspects of research articles. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 5(1), 34–38.
Hoskins, S. G., Lopatto, D., & Stevens, L. M. (2011). The C.R.E.A.T.E. approach to primary literature shifts undergraduates’ self-assessed ability to read and analyze journal articles, attitudes about science, and epistemological beliefs. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027
Jamieson, S., & Howard, R. M. (2013). Sentence-mining: Uncovering the amount of reading and reading comprehension in college writers’ researched writing. In R. McClure, & J. P. Purdy (Eds.), The new digital scholar: Exploring and enriching the research and writing practices of NextGen students (pp. 111–133). Medford, NJ: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
Johns, A. (2002). Destabilizing and enriching novice students’ genre theories. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 237–246). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kelsky, K. (2015). The professor is in: The essential guide to turning your Ph.D. into a job. Three Rivers Press.
Kim, S., Hwang, Y. J., & Kwak, Y. (2021). Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 detection and reversed RT-PCR results in mild or asymptomatic patients. Infectious Diseases, 53(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2020.1820076
Kocatepe, M. (2021). Reconceptualising the notion of finding information: How undergraduate students construct information as they read-to-write in an academic writing class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101042
Lammers, A., Goedhart, M. J., & Avraamidou, L. (2019). Reading and synthesising science texts using a scientific argumentation model by undergraduate biology students. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2323–2346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1675197
Lennox, R., Hepburn, K., Leaman, E., & van Houten, N. (2020). “I”m probably just gonna skim’: An assessment of undergraduate students’ primary scientific literature reading approaches. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1409–1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.176504
Liao, M.-K. (2017). A simple activity to enhance the learning experience of reading primary literature. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1211
Marvar, S. K., & Doperalski, A. (2019). Using primary research literature as a teaching tool in an undergraduate human anatomy and physiology course. The FASEB Journal, 33(S1), 766.6–766.6. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1_supplement.766.6
Reid, R. J., Rosella, L., Milijasevic, N., & Small, L. N. (2020). Mass testing for asymptomatic COVID-19 infection among health care workers at a large Canadian hospital. Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada, 5(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.3138/jammi-2020-0027
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Van Lacum, E., Koeneman, M., Ossevoort, M., & Goedhart, M. (2016). Scientific argumentation model (SAM): A heuristic for reading research articles by science students. In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou, & C. P. Constantinou (Eds.), Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 169–183). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_12
van Lacum, E., Ossevoort, M., & Goedhart, M. (2014). A teaching strategy with a focus on argumentation to improve undergraduate students’ ability to read research articles. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-011
Vroom, J. (2021). [UTM RGASC Academic Skills]. (2021, November 10). A strategy for reading research articles [video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/0A0YJs7ysj4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jonathan Vroom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
If this article is selected for publication in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, the work shall be published electronically under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows users to adapt and build upon the published work, but requires them to attribute the original publication and license their derivative works under the same terms. There is no fee required for submission or publication. Authors retain unrestricted copyright and all publishing rights, and are permitted to deposit all versions of their paper in an institutional or subject repository.
