Doctoral Student Reading and Writing: Making Our Processes Visible
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.1055Keywords:
doctoral writing, doctoral reading, academic writing, doctoral student identityAbstract
Reading and writing are core components of what it means to be a doctoral student. Although reading and writing are known to be discursive, socialized practices, doctoral programs often focus on the output of these practices and position reading and writing as generic, universal skills. Through collaborative self-study, we sought to examine our reading and writing processes and see what we could learn as doctoral students by making these processes visible. From our analysis, we discovered that understanding our reading and writing processes enabled us to use effective reading and writing strategies; revealed the benefits of blurring personal-professional boundaries; and contributed to shaping our identity as emerging scholars. We conclude that supporting doctoral students to examine their personalized reading and writing processes, opposed to solely focusing on output, can support them to look inward, locate meaning within themselves, and recognize the multiplicity in what it means to read and write at the doctoral level.
References
Aitchison, C. & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680574
Aitchison, C. & Mowbray, S. (2013). Doctoral women: Managing emotions, managing doctoral studies. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827642
Arnold, J. (2011). The self as data: A qualitative methodology. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v1n1p65
Badenhorst, C. M. (2018). Emotions, play and graduate student writing. Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing, 28(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.625
Badenhorst, C., & Amell, B. (2019). Inextricable: Doctoral writing, engagement, and creativity. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 2(3), 118-137.
Badenhorst, C., & Guerin, C. (2016). Post/graduate research literacies and writing pedagogies. In C. Badenhorst & C.Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 3-28). Brill.
Badenhorst, C., Moloney, C., Rosales, J., Dyer, J., & Ru, L. (2015). Beyond deficit: Graduate student research writing pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-11. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.945160
Baker, S., Bangeni, B., Burke, R., & Hunma, A. (2019). The invisibility of academic reading as social practice and its implications for equity in higher education: A scoping study. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 142-156.
Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctoral student to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5-17.
Baptista, A., Frick, L., Holley, K., Remmik, M., Tesch, J., Akerlind, G. (2015). The doctorate as original contribution to knowledge: Considering relationships between originality, creativity, and innovation. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i3.147
Barnacle, R. (2005). Research education ontologies: exploring doctoral becoming. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062995
Benge, C. L., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Mallette, M. H., & Burgess, M. L. (2010). Doctoral students’ perceptions of barriers to reading empirical literature: A mixed analysis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 55.
Berthoff, A. E. (1982). Forming, thinking, writing: The composing imagination. Heinemann Educational Books Inc.
Berthoff, A. E. (1983). How we construe is how we construct. Forum: Essays on theory and practice in the teaching of writing, 166-170.
Bochner, A. (1997). It’s about time: Narrative and the divided self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300404
Bunn, M. (2011). How to read like a writer. Writing spaces: Readings on writing, 2, 71-86.
Burford, J. (2017). Conceptualising doctoral writing as an affective-political practice. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.28945/3689
Burgess, M. L., Benge, C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Mallette, M. H. (2012). Doctoral students' reasons for reading empirical research articles: A mixed analysis. Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(3), 5-33.
Butler, B. M., & Bullock, S. M. (2022). The complications of collaboration in self-study. In B. M. and Butler, S. M. Bullock (Eds.), Learning through collaboration in self-study (pp. 1–11). Springer Nature Singapore
Castle, J. B., & Woloshyn, V. (2003). Motherhood and academia: Learning from our lived experience. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement, 5(2), 35-46.
Collins, A. (1998). Mothers as teachers—teachers as mothers. In S. Abbey & A. O’Reilly (Eds.), Redefining motherhood: changing identities and patterns. (pp. 92–102). Second Story Press.
Colyar, J. (2009). Becoming writing, becoming writers. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(2), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800408318280
Colyar, J. (2016). Reflections on writing and autoethnography. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, and C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 363–383). Routledge.
Déri, C. E., Tremblay-Wragg, E., & Mathieau-C., S. (2022). Academic writing groups in higher education: History and state of play. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n1p85
Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers (Second edition.). Oxford University Press.
Foot, R., Crowe, A. R., Tollafield, K. A., & Allan, C. E. (2014). Exploring doctoral student identity development using a self-study approach. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 2(1), 103-118.
Grant B., & Knowles, S. (2000). Flights of imagination: Academic women be(com)ing writers. The International Journal for Academic Development, 5(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/136014400410060
Guðjónsdóttir, H., & Jónsdóttir, S. R. (2022). Collaboration in self-study to soter professional and personal agency. In B. M. and Butler, S. M. Bullock (Eds.), Learning through collaboration in self-study (pp. 117–126). Springer Nature Singapore
Haas, C., & Flower, L. (1988). Rhetorical reading strategies and the construction of meaning. College Composition and Communication, 39(2), 167-183.
Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2013). A topography of collaboration: Methodology, identity and community in self-study of practice research. Studying Teacher Education, 9(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2013.771572
Hopwood, N., Alexander, P., Harris-Huemmert, S., McAlpine, L., & Wagstaff, S. (2011). The hidden realities of life as a doctoral student. In V. Kumar & A. Lee (Eds.), Doctoral education in international context: Connecting local, regional and global perspectives (pp. 212-231). Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M., & Chlup, D. (2017). Graduate students as academic writers: writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881
Jensen, J. (2017). Write no matter what: Advice for academics. The University of Chicago Press.
Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Routledge.
Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1102/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01284.x
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
Kekeya, J. (2016). Analysing qualitative data using an iterative process. Contemporary PNG Studies, 24, 86–94. https://web-p-ebscohost-com.qe2a-proxy.mun.ca/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=5a2537c9-3f03-4b6f-ab82-10a3930a89e5%40redis
Kitchen, J. (2022). Foreword. In B. M. and Butler, S. M. Bullock (Eds.), Learning through collaboration in self-study (pp. v–viii). Springer Nature Singapore
Kozar, O., & Lum, J. F. (2013). Factors likely to impact the effectiveness of research writing groups for off-campus doctoral students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 7(2), 132–149. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/267
Kwan, B. S. (2008). The nexus of reading, writing and researching in the doctoral undertaking of humanities and social sciences: Implications for literature reviewing. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.05.002
Kwan, B. (2009). Reading in preparation for writing a PhD thesis: Case studies of experiences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.02.001
LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and it’s theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. L. Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 817–869). Springer.
Leijen, Ä., Lepp, L., & Remmik, M. (2016). Why did I drop out? Former students’ recollections about their study process and factors related to leaving the doctoral studies. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1055463
Lee, A., Brennan, M., & Green, B. (2009). Re‐imagining doctoral education: professional doctorates and beyond. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 275-287. doi:10.1080/07294360902839883
Leshem, S., & Trafford, V. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081407
Manarin, K., Carey, M., Rathburn, M., & Ryland, G. (2015). Critical reading in higher education: Academic goals and social engagement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Mann, S. (2000). The student’s experience of reading. Higher Education, 39, 297–317.
Mantai, L. (2019). ‘A source of sanity’: The role of social support for doctoral candidates’ belonging and becoming. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 367-382.https://doi.org/10.28945/4275
McAlpine, L. (2012). Shining a light on doctoral reading: Implications for doctoral identities and pedagogies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(4), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.728875
McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009). Identity and agency: pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 109-125. https://doi-org.qe2a-proxy.mun.ca/10.1080/01580370902927378
McMinn, M. R., Tabor, A., Thrihub, B. L., Taylor, L., & Dominguez A. W. (2009). Reading in graduate school: A survey of doctoral students in clinical psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 233–239.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Murray, R. (2006). Reconfiguring academic writing. In Society for Research into Higher Education conference, December, in Brighton, UK.
Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2017). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in higher education, 42(3), 572-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598
Olan, E. L., & Edge, C. (2019). Collaborative meaning-making and dialogic interactions in critical friends as co-authors. Studying Teacher Education, 15(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2019.1580011
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Academic procrastinators and perfectionistic tendencies among graduate students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(5), 103-109.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., & Schwartz, R. A. (2001). The role of study skills in graduate-level educational research courses. Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 238-246.
Paré, A. (2009). What we know about writing, and why it matters. Compendium 2: Writing, Teaching, and Learning in the University, 2(1). https://ojs.library.dal.ca/C2/article/viewFile/3720/3408
Reason, P. (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. Sage.
Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. Rutgers University Press.
Richardson, L. (2001). Getting personal: Writing-stories. International Journal of Qualitative Studies, 14(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390010007647
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Schubert Walker, L. J., & Stewart, D. W. (2000). Over-coming the powerlessness of procrastination. Guidance & Counselling, 16(1), 39–44.
Starke-Meyerring, D. (2011). The paradox of writing in doctoral education: Student experiences. In L. McAlpine and C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 75–95). Springer.
Starke-Meyerring, D., Pare, A., Yan Sun, K., and El-Bezre, N. (2014). Probing normalized institutional discourses about writing: The case of the doctoral thesis. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 8(2), 13–27.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2018). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417734567
Stump, M., & Gannon C. (2022). “Do you have five minutes?”: An investigation of two doctoral students’ critical friendship. In B. M. and Butler, S. M. Bullock (Eds.), Learning through collaboration in self-study (pp. 39–52). Springer Nature Singapore.
Van Pletzen, E. (2006). A body of reading: Making ‘visible’ the reading experiences of firstyear medical students. In L.T.E.v. Pletzen (Ed.), Academic literacy and the language of change (pp. 104–129). Continuum.
Wohl, H., & Fine, G. A. (2017a). Reading rites: Teaching textwork in graduate education. The American Sociologist, 48, 215-232.
Wohl, H., & Fine, G. A. (2017b). The active skim: Efficient reading as a moral challenge in postgraduate education. Teaching Sociology, 45(3), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X17697770
Yoo, J. (2019a). Creative writing and academic timelessness. New Writing, 16(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2018.41490776
Yoo, J. (2019b). A year of writing ‘dangerously’: A narrative of hope. New Writing, 16(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2018.1520893
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Melanie Doyle, Chantelle Caissie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
If this article is selected for publication in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, the work shall be published electronically under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows users to adapt and build upon the published work, but requires them to attribute the original publication and license their derivative works under the same terms. There is no fee required for submission or publication. Authors retain unrestricted copyright and all publishing rights, and are permitted to deposit all versions of their paper in an institutional or subject repository.
